One-sided crossing
In regard to a third crossing [“Third Crossing Society steps up advocacy,” December 14], I’ve read through the Third Crossing Society website. They say that they’ve “done their homework” and “done substantial research.” Yet all they look at are potential benefits.
Solid, robust research should and would include consideration and discussion of possible negative consequences/effects. Maybe I missed something, but I didn’t see anything like that on their website.
Such a lopsided approach suggests that what they’re presenting as “research” is actually more like a special interest/lobbyists’ sales pitch.
Right from the get-go, I don’t agree with their claim that, “From the outset, it must be understood and acknowledged that the ferry service as it exists today is unacceptable. There appears to be almost universal agreement on this point.”
I’d be interested to know what “research” they’re basing this claim on. I’m actually pretty happy with our ferry service (and so are a lot of people I know). Sure, I might grumble on occasion, but that certainly doesn’t mean I’d opt to replace the ferries with a huge overland highway.
I understand Third Crossing Society has a number of supporters who envision that fixed-road access would be beneficial to our town.
I am also aware that there are a number of people who, like myself, do not share these views and, for numerous reasons, are opposed to the proposal.
So far, public discussion has largely been dominated by Third Crossing advocates. I’d really like to see that change.
We need a broader discussion: one that includes views from a range of people and a consideration of potential cons, not just pros.
Angela Gunther
Invermere Court
Expensive privilege
Third crossing: What an idea [“Third Crossing Society steps up advocacy,” December 14].
We all moved here, to the middle of nowhere, to live in a beautiful town with beautiful people and the nicest weather in all of Canada.
But, we came by ferry. Who can afford to pay for ferries?
They supply hundreds of jobs for local people and get us where we have to go. We could buy our own boat to get us from paradise to shopping, but that would be more expensive, so we live in the nicest town in Canada and whine about it.
BC Ferries pays many millions of dollars to supply modern, safe ships, and many millions more for fuel. Your fare is not even beginning to pay for the services you require to live in your corner of paradise.
Now you are considering a third crossing? Let’s pay more than another Coquihalla, just for the privilege to drive to Pemberton and arrive in Vancouver two hours after the ferry traffic.
I’m confused here. Why the hell did you move here if all you want is a road to Alberta.
L.V. Shore
Townsite
